• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/385/15.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    BOYDEN v. MAY, 385 U.S. 15 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BOYDEN v. MAY, 385 U.S. 15 (1966)

    385 U.S. 15

    BOYDEN v. MAY, WARDEN.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN
    DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 351, Misc.
    Decided October 10, 1966.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Appellant pro se.

    Solicitor General Marshall for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


    BRADFORD v. HELMAN, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=385&invol=15">385 U.S. 15 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 15 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BRADFORD v. HELMAN, 385 U.S. 15 (1966)

    385 U.S. 15

    BRADFORD v. HELMAN, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE
    OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 389, Misc.
    Decided October 10, 1966.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Appellant pro se.

    Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 15, 16]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw