• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/385/11.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    CAPELOUTO v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., 385 U.S. 11 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    CAPELOUTO v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., 385 U.S. 11 (1966)

    385 U.S. 11

    CAPELOUTO v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. OF FLORIDA, INC.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
    No. 316.
    Decided October 10, 1966.

    183 So.2d 532, appeal dismissed.

    Wilfred C. Varn for appellant.

    J. Lewis Hall for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


    MASLOWSKY v. CASSIDY, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=385&invol=11">385 U.S. 11 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 11 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    MASLOWSKY v. CASSIDY, 385 U.S. 11 (1966)

    385 U.S. 11

    MASLOWSKY ET AL. v. CASSIDY, CHAIRMAN, ILLINOIS HOUSE OF
    REPRESENTATIVES COMMISSION, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 574.
    Decided October 10, 1966.

    34 Ill. 2d 456, 216 N. E. 2d 669, appeal dismissed.

    Albert E. Jenner, Jr., and Thomas P. Sullivan for appellants.

    Owen Rall for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [385 U.S. 11, 12]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw