• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/385/10.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    REED v. ILLINOIS, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    REED v. ILLINOIS, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)

    385 U.S. 10

    REED v. ILLINOIS.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
    No. 282.
    Decided October 10, 1966.

    33 Ill. 2d 535, 213 N. E. 2d 278, appeal dismissed.

    Mort A. Segall for appellant.

    William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


    TREFFRY v. TAYLOR, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=385&invol=10">385 U.S. 10 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 10 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    TREFFRY v. TAYLOR, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)

    385 U.S. 10

    TREFFRY ET AL. v. TAYLOR, DIRECTOR OF LICENSES FOR THE STATE OF
    WASHINGTON, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 291.
    Decided October 10, 1966.

    67 Wash. 2d 487, 408 P.2d 269, appeal dismissed.

    Francis J. Conklin for appellants.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 10, 11]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw