• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/383/575.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    PUGACH v. NEW YORK, 383 U.S. 575 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    PUGACH v. NEW YORK, 383 U.S. 575 (1966)

    383 U.S. 575

    PUGACH v. NEW YORK.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
    No. 131, Misc.
    Decided March 21, 1966.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Petitioner pro se.

    Isidore Dollinger and Bertram R. Gelfand for respondent.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [383 U.S. 575, 576]  


    COUNTY BOARD, ELECTION, MONROE CTY. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=575">383 U.S. 575 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 575 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    COUNTY BOARD, ELECTION, MONROE CTY. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 575 (1966)

    383 U.S. 575

    COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTION OF MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK, ET AL. v.
    UNITED STATES.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1040.
    Decided March 21, 1966.

    248 F. Supp. 316, appeal dismissed.

    Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, Ruth Kessler Toch, Acting Solicitor General, and William A. Stevens for appellants.

    Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Swift & Co. v. Wickham, 382 U.S. 111 ; Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 382 U.S. 281 .

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw