• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/383/104.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    HC&D MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. YAMANE, 383 U.S. 104 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    HC&D MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. YAMANE, 383 U.S. 104 (1966)

    383 U.S. 104

    HC&D MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., ET AL. v. YAMANE, STATE TAX COLLECTOR.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF HAWAII.
    No. 855.
    Decided February 21, 1966.

    48 Haw. 486, 405 P.2d 382, appeal dismissed.

    J. Garner Anthony for appellants.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [383 U.S. 104, 105]  


    NOLAN v. RHODES, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=104">383 U.S. 104 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 104 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    NOLAN v. RHODES, 383 U.S. 104 (1966)

    383 U.S. 104

    NOLAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
    DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 836.
    Decided February 21, 1966.

    251 F. Supp. 584, affirmed.

    Kenneth G. Weinberg and Stewart R. Jaffy for appellant.

    William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

    MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw