• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/379/6.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    MALONEY v. HOLDEN, 379 U.S. 6 (1964)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    MALONEY v. HOLDEN, 379 U.S. 6 (1964)

    379 U.S. 6

    MALONEY v. HOLDEN, JUDGE.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
    No. 225, Misc.
    Decided October 12, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 6, 7]  


    COOPER-JARRETT, v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=379&invol=6">379 U.S. 6 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 6 (1964) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    COOPER-JARRETT, v. UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 6 (1964)

    379 U.S. 6

    COOPER-JARRETT, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
    MISSOURI. No. 159.
    Decided October 12, 1964.

    226 F. Supp. 318, affirmed.

    Kenneth E. Midgley, Thomas J. Hogan, Bryce Rea, Jr., Roland Rice, Homer S. Carpenter and John S. Fessenden for appellants.

    Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.; and Carl E. Enggas, D. Robert Thomas, John F. Donelan, Nuel D. Belnap, Harvey Huston, John A. Daily, Paul R. Duke and John M. Cleary for Eastern Railroads et al., appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw