• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/378/580.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC. v. WASHINGTON, 378 U.S. 580 (1964)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC. v. WASHINGTON, 378 U.S. 580 (1964)

    378 U.S. 580

    INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
    No. 849.
    Decided June 22, 1964. *  

    Appeals dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 619, 384 P.2d 337.

    [ Footnote * ] Together with No. 850, Hebb & Narodick Construction Co., Inc., et al. v. Washington et al., and No. 851, Murray et al. v. Washington et al., both also on appeal from the same court.

    Seth W. Morrison for appellants in No. 849.

    T. M. Royce for appellants in No. 850.

    Edward G. Dobrin for appellants in No. 851.

    John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, John W. Riley and Timothy R. Malone, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and James A. Furber, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

    Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and I. Henry Kutz filed a memorandum for the United States.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [378 U.S. 580, 581]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw