• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/377/404.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 404 (1964)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 404 (1964)

    377 U.S. 404

    WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
    No. 1022, Misc.
    Decided June 1, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [377 U.S. 404, 405]  


    UNION OIL CO. v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CAL., <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=377&invol=404">377 U.S. 404 </a> (1964) 377 U.S. 404 (1964) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    UNION OIL CO. v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CAL., 377 U.S. 404 (1964)

    377 U.S. 404

    UNION OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
    No. 968.
    Decided June 1, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 60 Cal. 2d 441, 386 P.2d 496.

    Hart H. Spiegel for appellant.

    Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and John J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw