• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/377/215.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    SINCLAIR v. BAKER, 377 U.S. 215 (1964)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SINCLAIR v. BAKER, 377 U.S. 215 (1964)

    377 U.S. 215

    SINCLAIR v. BAKER ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
    APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 949.
    Decided May 18, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    Reported below: 219 Cal. App. 2d 817, 33 Cal. Rptr. 522.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [377 U.S. 215, 216]  


    LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CAL., <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=377&invol=215">377 U.S. 215 </a> (1964) 377 U.S. 215 (1964) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CAL., 377 U.S. 215 (1964)

    377 U.S. 215

    LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP CO., INC., v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD JUDICIAL
    DISTRICT. No. 916.
    Decided May 18, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 219 Cal. App. 2d 710, 33 Cal. Rptr. 544.

    Hart H. Spiegel and John Hays for appellant.

    Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and John J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw