• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/375/394.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964)

    375 U.S. 394

    RATIGAN ET AL. v. DAVIS ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA.
    No. 547.
    Decided January 6, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 175 Neb. 416, 122 N. W. 2d 12.

    Benjamin M. Wall for appellants.

    William R. King and Seymour L. Smith for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


    SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=375&invol=394">375 U.S. 394 </a> (1964) 375 U.S. 394 (1964) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 394 (1964)

    375 U.S. 394

    SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
    No. 562.
    Decided January 6, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 618, 191 N. E. 2d 91.

    Charles E. Bernstein for appellant.

    Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Solomon Portnow for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 394, 395]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw