• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/374/491.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA, 374 U.S. 491 (1963)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA, 374 U.S. 491 (1963)

    374 U.S. 491

    PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
    No. 884, Misc.
    Decided June 17, 1963.

    Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

    Petitioner pro se.

    Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .


    ACUFF v. TEXAS, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=374&invol=491">374 U.S. 491 </a> (1963) 374 U.S. 491 (1963) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    ACUFF v. TEXAS, 374 U.S. 491 (1963)

    374 U.S. 491

    ACUFF v. TEXAS.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
    No. 1348, Misc.
    Decided June 17, 1963.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 172 Tex. Cr. R. 176, 354 S. W. 2d 939.

    Appellant pro se.

    Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam R. Wilson, Linward Shivers, Allo B. Crow, Jr. and Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [374 U.S. 491, 492]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw