• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/373/243.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    CLARK v. PENNSYLVANIA, 373 U.S. 243 (1963)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    CLARK v. PENNSYLVANIA, 373 U.S. 243 (1963)

    373 U.S. 243

    CLARK v. PENNSYLVANIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
    No. 689, Misc.
    Decided May 13, 1963.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [373 U.S. 243, 244]  


    BAKER v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=373&invol=243">373 U.S. 243 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 243 (1963) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BAKER v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 243 (1963)

    373 U.S. 243

    BAKER v. UNITED STATES.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 494, Misc.
    Decided May 13, 1963.

    Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

    Reported below: 306 F.2d 491.

    Petitioner pro se.

    Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington for further consideration in light of Sanders v. United States, ante, p. 1.

    MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would deny certiorari on the basis of their dissent in Sanders v. United States, ante, p. 23.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw