• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/372/708.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    PUNTARI v. PENNSYLVANIA, 372 U.S. 708 (1963)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    PUNTARI v. PENNSYLVANIA, 372 U.S. 708 (1963)

    372 U.S. 708

    PUNTARI v. PENNSYLVANIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
    No. 718, Misc.
    Decided April 15, 1963.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [372 U.S. 708, 709]  


    LUCKMAN v. DUNBAR, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=372&invol=708">372 U.S. 708 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 708 (1963) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LUCKMAN v. DUNBAR, 372 U.S. 708 (1963)

    372 U.S. 708

    LUCKMAN v. DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
    No. 63, Misc.
    Decided April 15, 1963.

    Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

    Petitioner pro se.

    Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and John S. McInerny, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

    MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358 , 360.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw