Could not find header file for oye

 

  • View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/367/903.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    BARGAINTOWN v. WHITMAN, 367 U.S. 903 (1961)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BARGAINTOWN v. WHITMAN, 367 U.S. 903 (1961)

    367 U.S. 903

    BARGAINTOWN, U.S. A., INC., ET AL. v. WHITMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
    OF LEBANON COUNTY PA., ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF

    PENNSYLVANIA.

    No. 76.
    Decided June 19, 1961.

    ___ F. Supp. ___, affirmed.

    David G. Bress and Leonard Braman for appellants.

    Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Harry J. Rubin for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The judgment is affirmed. McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 , and Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc., v. McGinley, 366 U.S. 582 .

    MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


    BECK v. MAINE, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?friend=oye&court=us&vol=367&invol=903">367 U.S. 903 </a> (1961) 367 U.S. 903 (1961) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BECK v. MAINE, 367 U.S. 903 (1961)

    367 U.S. 903

    BECK v. MAINE.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE.
    No. 899.
    Decided June 19, 1961.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 156 Me. 403, 165 A. 2d 433.

    A. Raymond Rogers for appellant.

    Frank E. Hancock, Attorney General of Maine, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [367 U.S. 903, 904]  

    FindLaw Career Center

    Ads by FindLaw