• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/361/534.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)

    361 U.S. 534

    NEW YORK EX REL. VALENTI v. McCLOSKEY, SHERIFF, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
    No. 563.
    Decided February 23, 1960.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

    Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 390, 160 N. E. 2d 647.

    Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant.

    Eliot H. Lumbard and Nathan Skolnik for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.


    NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=361&invol=534">361 U.S. 534 </a> (1960) 361 U.S. 534 (1960) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)

    361 U.S. 534

    NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
    No. 564.
    Decided February 23, 1960.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 220 Md. 418, 153 A. 2d 287.

    Herbert M. Brune for appellant.

    C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and John Martin Jones, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [361 U.S. 534, 535]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw