• View enhanced case on Westlaw
    		•
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
    		•  http://laws.findlaw.com/us/358/282.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    F. & M. SCHAEFER BREW. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER, NEW YORK, 358 U.S. 282 (1959)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    F. & M. SCHAEFER BREW. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER, NEW YORK, 358 U.S. 282 (1959)

    358 U.S. 282

    F. & M. SCHAEFER BREWING CO. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW
    YORK.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 526.
    Decided January 12, 1959.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 4 N. Y. 2d 423, 151 N. E. 2d 845.

    Russell D. Morrill and Francis L. Casey for appellant.

    Stanley Buchsbaum and Morris L. Heath for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

    McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=358&invol=282">358 U.S. 282 </a> (1959) 358 U.S. 282 (1959) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 282 (1959)

    358 U.S. 282

    McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
    DISTRICT. No. 283, Misc.
    Decided January 12, 1959.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 492, 321 P.2d 497.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [358 U.S. 282, 283]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw