• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/355/603.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)

    355 U.S. 603

    TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMERICAN PRODUCTION CO. ET AL. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY,
    TEXAS, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. No. 574.
    Decided March 3, 1958.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 157 Tex. ___, 303 S. W. 2d 780.

    Francis G. Coates for appellants.

    Dow H. Heard for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


    OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=355&invol=603">355 U.S. 603 </a> (1958) 355 U.S. 603 (1958) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)

    355 U.S. 603

    OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF
    ACCOUNTANCY.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 623.
    Decided March 3, 1958.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 96 So.2d 139.

    Edward McCarthy and Elliott Adams for appellant.

    Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Justin L. Edgerton and L. William Graham for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [355 U.S. 603, 604]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw