• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/355/10.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 10 (1957)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 10 (1957)

    355 U.S. 10

    NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
    No. 114.
    Decided October 14, 1957.

    Judgment affirmed.

    Thurman Arnold, Reed Miller and William T. Stephens for appellants.

    Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


    WHITE v. WASHINGTON., <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=355&invol=10">355 U.S. 10 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 10 (1957) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    WHITE v. WASHINGTON., 355 U.S. 10 (1957)

    355 U.S. 10

    WHITE ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS KITSAP AUTOMATIC DISPENSER CO., ET AL.
    v. WASHINGTON.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 184.
    Decided October 14, 1957.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 49 Wash. 2d 716, 306 P.2d 230.

    S. Harold Shefelman for appellants.

    John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Keith Grim and Fred C. Dorsey, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [355 U.S. 10, 11]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw