Could not find header file for oye

 

  • View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/236/247.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    MUTUAL FILM CO. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, 236 U.S. 247 (1915)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    MUTUAL FILM CO. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, 236 U.S. 247 (1915)

    236 U.S. 247

    MUTUAL FILM COMPANY, Appt.,
    v.
    INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO et al.
    No. 457.

    Supreme Court of the United States
    Argued January 6 and 7, 1915

    February 23, 1915

    Messrs. William B. Sanders, Walter N. Seligsberg, and Harold T. Clark for appellant.

    Messrs. Waldo G. Morse and Jacob Schechter as amici curioe.

    Messrs. Robert M. Morgan, Clarence D. Laylin, James I. Boulger, and Mr. Timothy S. Hogan, Attorney General of Ohio, for appellees. [236 U.S. 247, 248]  

    Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

    This case was submitted with No. 456 [ 236 U.S. 230 , 59 L. ed. --, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 387], just decided. In the latter case the complainant in the court below, and appellant here, was a corporation of Virginia. The appellant in the pending case is a corporation of Ohio, and counsel say, 'although there are some differences in the way in which their business is conducted, yet the question involved are the same the records in both cases are nearly identical, and the court below treated them together, rendering the one opinion to cover both.' And counsel have submitted them on the same argument.

    On the authority, therefore, of the opinion in No. 456, the decree is affirmed.

    FindLaw Career Center

    Ads by FindLaw