Opinion Summaries Archive

FindLaw archives its summaries of published opinions issued since September 2000 by the U.S. Supreme Court, all thirteen U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, and select state supreme and appellate courts. FindLaw also provides FREE Case Summary Newsletters, FREE Case Summary Blogs, and FREE Case Summary RSS Feeds.

Sponsored Link

Search Opinion Summaries

Fill in at least one field
Court:
Legal Topic:
Docket Number:
  (e.g., 98-6405)
Party name
  (Enter One Party's Name e.g., GORE)
Date:
  (MM/DD/YY)
Date(s) From: To:
  (MM/DD/YY)         (MM/DD/YY)
Full Text Search

 [options]

 

FREE Case Summary Blogs

FREE Case Summary Newsletters

FREE Case Summary RSS Feeds

Staff Favorites

  • Narricot Indus., LP v. NLRB (U.S. 4th Cir.) - Petitioner's request for review of a decision of the NLRB (Board), arising from allegations of various unfair labor practice charges, is denied where: 1) the Board decision was properly issued by a two-member quorum pursuant to 29 U.S.C. section 153(b); and 2) the Board's decision is enforceable on the merits.

  • In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig. (U.S. 1st Cir.) - Approval of a settlement in a class action lawsuit involving claims that AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals published artificially inflated prescription drug prices is affirmed where: 1) district court did not abuse its discretion by finding the settlement provision creating a cy pres fund was fair, adequate, and reasonable; 2) plaintiff's objection to class counsel allegedly negotiating attorneys' fees with the settlement is waived; 3) district court satisfied the requirements of Rule 23(c)(1)(B); and 4) plaintiff's argument that the district court did not properly certify class counsel under Rule 23(g) is waived.

  • EEOC v. United Parcel Serv., Inc. (U.S. 2d Cir.) - In the EEOC's appeal from a denial of its petition to enforce an administrative subpoena issued to UPS seeking information about how religious exemptions to UPS's Uniform and Personal Appearance Guidelines were handled nationwide, the order is reversed where the district court, in finding that national information was not relevant to the charges being investigated by the EEOC, applied too restrictive a standard of relevance.

    •  

    Sign-up for FREE Newsletters»

    Browse Opinion Summaries

    By Court

    By Company

    By Legal Topic

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw