Laws: Cases and Codes : U.S. Code : Title 28 : Section 2266


   
U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 2266. Limitation periods for determining applications and motions

      (a) The adjudication of any application under section 2254 that
    is subject to this chapter, and the adjudication of any motion
    under section 2255 by a person under sentence of death, shall be
    given priority by the district court and by the court of appeals
    over all noncapital matters.
      (b)(1)(A) A district court shall render a final determination and
    enter a final judgment on any application for a writ of habeas
    corpus brought under this chapter in a capital case not later than
    180 days after the date on which the application is filed.
      (B) A district court shall afford the parties at least 120 days
    in which to complete all actions, including the preparation of all
    pleadings and briefs, and if necessary, a hearing, prior to the
    submission of the case for decision.
      (C)(i) A district court may delay for not more than one
    additional 30-day period beyond the period specified in
    subparagraph (A), the rendering of a determination of an
    application for a writ of habeas corpus if the court issues a
    written order making a finding, and stating the reasons for the
    finding, that the ends of justice that would be served by allowing
    the delay outweigh the best interests of the public and the
    applicant in a speedy disposition of the application.
      (ii) The factors, among others, that a court shall consider in
    determining whether a delay in the disposition of an application is
    warranted are as follows:
        (I) Whether the failure to allow the delay would be likely to
      result in a miscarriage of justice.
        (II) Whether the case is so unusual or so complex, due to the
      number of defendants, the nature of the prosecution, or the
      existence of novel questions of fact or law, that it is
      unreasonable to expect adequate briefing within the time
      limitations established by subparagraph (A).
        (III) Whether the failure to allow a delay in a case that,
      taken as a whole, is not so unusual or so complex as described in
      subclause (II), but would otherwise deny the applicant reasonable
      time to obtain counsel, would unreasonably deny the applicant or
      the government continuity of counsel, or would deny counsel for
      the applicant or the government the reasonable time necessary for
      effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due
      diligence.

      (iii) No delay in disposition shall be permissible because of
    general congestion of the court's calendar.
      (iv) The court shall transmit a copy of any order issued under
    clause (i) to the Director of the Administrative Office of the
    United States Courts for inclusion in the report under paragraph
    (5).
      (2) The time limitations under paragraph (1) shall apply to - 
        (A) an initial application for a writ of habeas corpus;
        (B) any second or successive application for a writ of habeas
      corpus; and
        (C) any redetermination of an application for a writ of habeas
      corpus following a remand by the court of appeals or the Supreme
      Court for further proceedings, in which case the limitation
      period shall run from the date the remand is ordered.

      (3)(A) The time limitations under this section shall not be
    construed to entitle an applicant to a stay of execution, to which
    the applicant would otherwise not be entitled, for the purpose of
    litigating any application or appeal.
      (B) No amendment to an application for a writ of habeas corpus
    under this chapter shall be permitted after the filing of the
    answer to the application, except on the grounds specified in
    section 2244(b).
      (4)(A) The failure of a court to meet or comply with a time
    limitation under this section shall not be a ground for granting
    relief from a judgment of conviction or sentence.
      (B) The State may enforce a time limitation under this section by
    petitioning for a writ of mandamus to the court of appeals. The
    court of appeals shall act on the petition for a writ of mandamus
    not later than 30 days after the filing of the petition.
      (5)(A) The Administrative Office of the United States Courts
    shall submit to Congress an annual report on the compliance by the
    district courts with the time limitations under this section.
      (B) The report described in subparagraph (A) shall include copies
    of the orders submitted by the district courts under paragraph
    (1)(B)(iv).
      (c)(1)(A) A court of appeals shall hear and render a final
    determination of any appeal of an order granting or denying, in
    whole or in part, an application brought under this chapter in a
    capital case not later than 120 days after the date on which the
    reply brief is filed, or if no reply brief is filed, not later than
    120 days after the date on which the answering brief is filed.
      (B)(i) A court of appeals shall decide whether to grant a
    petition for rehearing or other request for rehearing en banc not
    later than 30 days after the date on which the petition for
    rehearing is filed unless a responsive pleading is required, in
    which case the court shall decide whether to grant the petition not
    later than 30 days after the date on which the responsive pleading
    is filed.
      (ii) If a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc is granted,
    the court of appeals shall hear and render a final determination of
    the appeal not later than 120 days after the date on which the
    order granting rehearing or rehearing en banc is entered.
      (2) The time limitations under paragraph (1) shall apply to - 
        (A) an initial application for a writ of habeas corpus;
        (B) any second or successive application for a writ of habeas
      corpus; and
        (C) any redetermination of an application for a writ of habeas
      corpus or related appeal following a remand by the court of
      appeals en banc or the Supreme Court for further proceedings, in
      which case the limitation period shall run from the date the
      remand is ordered.

      (3) The time limitations under this section shall not be
    construed to entitle an applicant to a stay of execution, to which
    the applicant would otherwise not be entitled, for the purpose of
    litigating any application or appeal.
      (4)(A) The failure of a court to meet or comply with a time
    limitation under this section shall not be a ground for granting
    relief from a judgment of conviction or sentence.
      (B) The State may enforce a time limitation under this section by
    applying for a writ of mandamus to the Supreme Court.
      (5) The Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall
    submit to Congress an annual report on the compliance by the courts
    of appeals with the time limitations under this section.



Previous [Notes]

Related Resources

Judiciary Legal Guide

Litigation Legal Guide

U.S. Legal System Summary

Judiciary Discussion

Ads by FindLaw