Laws: Cases and Codes : U.S. Code : Title 25 : Section 1300j


   
U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 1300j. Findings

      The Congress finds the following:
        (1) The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians is the descendant
      of, and political successor to, the signatories of the Treaty of
      Greenville 1795 (7 Stat. 49); the Treaty of Grouseland 1805 (7
      Stat. 91); the Treaty of Spring Wells 1815 (7 Stat. 131); the
      Treaty of the Rapids of the Miami of Lake Erie 1817 (7 Stat.
      160); the Treaty of St. Mary's 1818 (7 Stat. 185); the Treaty of
      Chicago 1821 (7 Stat. 218); the Treaty of the Mississinewa on the
      Wabash 1826 (7 Stat. 295); the Treaty of St. Joseph 1827 (7 Stat.
      305); the Treaty of St. Joseph 1828 (7 Stat. 317); the Treaty of
      Tippecanoe River 1832 (7 Stat. 399); and the Treaty of Chicago
      1833 (7 Stat. 431).
        (2) In the Treaty of Chicago 1833, the Pokagon Band of
      Potawatomi Indians was the only band that negotiated a right to
      remain in Michigan. The other Potawatomi bands relinquished all
      lands in Michigan and were required to move to Kansas or Iowa.
        (3) Two of the Potawatomi bands later returned to the Great
      Lakes area, the Forest County Potawatomi of Wisconsin and the
      Hannahville Indian Community of Michigan.
        (4) The Hannahville Indian Community of Michigan, the Forest
      County Potawatomi Community of Wisconsin, the Prairie Band of
      Potawatomi Indians of Kansas, and the Citizen Band Potawatomi
      Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, whose members are also descendants of
      the signatories to one or more of the aforementioned treaties,
      have been recognized by the Federal Government as Indian tribes
      eligible to receive services from the Secretary of the Interior.
        (5) Beginning in 1935, the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians
      petitioned for reorganization and assistance pursuant to the Act
      of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et seq., commonly referred to as
      the "Indian Reorganization Act"). Because of the financial
      condition of the Federal Government during the Great Depression
      it relied upon the State of Michigan to provide services to the
      Pokagon Band. Other Potawatomi bands, including the Forest County
      Potawatomi and the Hannahville Indian Community were provided
      services pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act.
        (6) Agents of the Federal Government in 1939 made an
      administrative decision not to provide services or extend the
      benefits of the Indian Reorganization Act [25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.]
      to any Indian tribes in Michigan's lower peninsula.
        (7) Tribes elsewhere, including the Hannahville Indian
      Community in Michigan's upper peninsula, received services from
      the Federal Government and were extended the benefits of the
      Indian Reorganization Act [25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.].
        (8) The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians consists of at least
      1,500 members who continue to reside close to their ancestral
      homeland in the St. Joseph River Valley in southwestern Michigan
      and northern Indiana.
        (9) In spite of the denial of the right to organize under the
      Indian Reorganization Act [25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.], the Pokagon
      Band has continued to carry out its governmental functions
      through a Business Committee and Tribal Council from treaty times
      until today.
        (10) The United States Government, the government of the State
      of Michigan, and local governments have had continuous dealings
      with the recognized political leaders of the Band from 1795 until
      the present.



Previous [Notes] Next

Related Resources

American Indian Law Guide

American Indian Lands Summary

American Indian Law Articles and Documents

American Indian Law Discussion

Ads by FindLaw